Casino Streamers Achieve Coincidental Patterns of Wins in Jammin Jars

Following a surprising incident, Push Gaming must address how two distinct casino streamers achieved identical winning patterns in Jammin Jars.

Updated November 11, 2018.
{-{/em}-}

Such an occurrence should be extraordinarily rare. The likelihood is practically nonexistent. Jammin Jars Push Gaming's online slot game has been a viral sensation since its debut. This unusual event has only heightened people's interest. Today, a vigilant viewer submitted a video to YouTube showing two casino streamers winning identical, massive jackpots. When we say identical, we mean truly the same .

Those familiar with the gameplay of Jammin Jars would appreciate that countless combinations can happen at any moment on the 8×8 grid . Yet, shockingly, both streamers experienced the exact same winning combination, culminating in an identical 1660.15 xbet victory.

It’s baffling to attribute these events to mere glitches or errors in coding. Before certification, slot machines undergo rigorous testing over countless spins. Besides, the odds of such a 'bug' affecting two different streamers so close together are minimal. If it did occur, there would be grave implications for both Push Gaming and their testing partners.

Without any official word from Push Gaming, clarity remains elusive. A speculative idea is that automated demo sequences may be involved, though executing this in a live stream would be remarkably complex. Some developers embed this function in their test versions to showcase features without lengthy waits. However, in our reviews of Push Gaming slots, we've never encountered such a feature.

Theoretically, the game may have build sequences where outcomes and payment values are predetermined and the belligerent random number generator (RNG) sets the sequence randomly. Consequently, transfers would be similar to obtaining a specific line win on a 10-payline slot.

Whatever the underlying cause, everyone eagerly awaits Push Gaming's perspective. This incident surely places the developer in a difficult position, as they generally refrain from disclosing internal mechanics due to competitive and security considerations. Nevertheless, no cheating or foul play seems inherently involved.

We'll soon update this story upon receiving new information. Meanwhile, view the video and assess it yourself.

Update: Push Gaming’s response

Push Gaming eventually publicly addressed the unlikely event with the following statement:

“To understand the event in this video, a background on the game's design is necessary. Jammin’ Jars uses a random selection process from an extensive, predefined set of outcomes, explained by some members here. These wins feature cascading symbols, giant fruit icons, and multiplying wilds, deviating from conventional spinning reels—making the winning paths lengthy and mathematically intricate.

Effectively balancing the game while ensuring player enjoyment and using typical slot mechanics is exceedingly challenging (almost unachievable). We do not incorporate this method in our reel-based slot games.

Given that the results derive from an array of outcomes, duplications like the ones depicted are incredibly improbable, with a mere 1 in over 1.3 million chances, yet they occurred. The game is certified by third-party entity (eCOGRA) and operates with a 96.83% RTP.

As portrayed in the video, the identical result is astoundingly unlikely, and although suspicions arise, contrary to some suggestions here, we cannot provide pre-arranged outcomes.”

In summary of Push Gaming's response, they're asserting that the game employs an extensive yet finite database of probable results.

Essentially, win paths generating 1000x wins or 1600x wins are part of the game's design, triggered through random player actions. We theorize this hypothesis in guessing—maybe Push Gaming inadvertently limited outcome pools, resulting in less perceived randomness, as evidenced by the two streamers' identical experiences.

Despite initially appearing as a game with potentially limitless winning combinations (considering the grid design), in reality, it seems far less expansive, which may dissuade some players.

Around four days following this publication, another instance was spotlighted by a known YouTuber who first exposed this story. Astonishingly, two other streamers recently reported identical winning patterns on Jammin Jars on the same day. Those who found Push Gaming’s reply inadequate might now view it with skepticism.

Update October 7

If, as Push Gaming claims, the odds of this occurrence are 1 in over 1.3 million, what are the chances of it happening twice within weeks? To clarify—we’re not challenging the validity of the game, the company, or the streamers. Nonetheless, such events may reinforce suspicions that games are manipulated. Thus, a clear explanation from Push Gaming would serve everyone's best interests.Degsy Degworth We received further insights from a reader, who reported:

On reviewing documents, the apparent RTP for Jammin Jars by Push Gaming ( 96.83% ) appeared considerably higher than that recalculated by eCOGRA ( 95.17% ). Highlighting such a discrepancy doesn't intend to accuse Push Gaming, as I lack expertise to fully judge the info. Yet, this significant difference seems odd, raising questions about Push Gaming's continued RTP portrayal in the paytable. Push Gaming's commentary would be intriguing.”

Update October 11

spin-samurai-app.com reviewed the mentioned documents, yet refrained from commenting further. Despite differences occasionally appearing between developer-said numbers and eCOGRA results, these discrepancies alternate between positive and negative outcomes.

“After examining eCOGRA certification A new video has emerged displaying