Again, the plethora of rules, which often seem outrageous, don’t cover a requirement for continuous RTP visibility in software. It’s exasperating that you need to search help guides to locate RTP details, which can change unpredictably. Consider the Book of Dead; its 94% RTP version feels like a different game compared to its 96% version. Perhaps, these games should be given unique names according to their RTP, just like some have suggested.
😡
Honestly, it seems like those making regulations have no clue about gambling. They likely never indulge in it themselves yet decide on rules that impact the industry.
If you consider the Book of Dead at various RTPs, they are not completely different games as initially thought. Providers might reduce RTP, particularly in a situation like this where they might trim down potential maximum wins a bit.
In this specific situation, with the RTP reduction, you now have five reel sets with just one winning opportunity instead of two. Realistically, this doesn't change the gaming experience much, as the odds of hitting a max payout are extremely low anyway.
Generally, developers prefer to keep the game's feel consistent, especially for popular titles like Book of Dead.
However, in exceptional cases where RTP dips significantly, from say 95% to as low as 80%, it becomes a different matter altogether.
Hopefully, this sheds light, giving you a more complete understanding of the topic.
@juanmore I value the explanation, yet these game versions differ enough to warrant clear visibility outside the help file. It's undeniable that the 94% version indeed offers fewer spins compared to the 96% variant.
@yagood I see what you're saying and agree that altering games' RTPs that have been established for years might damage the industry and could lead to stricter regulations. Ironically though, stringent regulations might result in further RTP reductions, creating a vicious cycle.
Regulators have no genuine concern for players or promoting safe gambling. They're involved merely for financial gain. Regulations are enforced because authorities realized funds were leaving their domain. Don't fall for the notion that the UKGC or SGA are there to safeguard you. They're merely about retaining monetary control. Ignore anyone ridiculing you for using unlicensed platforms, as there's no obligation to remain 'loyal.'
It's puzzling why this isn’t mandatory already; it just highlights how indifferent regulators seem towards player welfare.
Consider sticking with game providers known for fixed RTPs like Relax, Yggdrasil, BTG, and 4ThePlayer to avoid any surprises.
@berliner Yes, I can affirm that viewpoint from my experience working on the Operator side.
The upcoming regulatory changes in the UK have the potential to significantly diminish the Slot industry.
No Autoplay?????
I agree, the slot gaming world offers numerous distinct versions of each game.
For me, it's become second nature to always review the help files before engaging with new slot games, just to be on the safe side.
Honestly, it seems like those making regulations have no clue about gambling. They likely never indulge in it themselves yet decide on rules that impact the industry.
oofr
