
Bigwinboard is widely recognized, and any statement made here can significantly impact public perception, though not everyone recognizes this power. I’m confident you’ll find better collaborations or already have, and with time, they’ll realize their oversight.
I’m relieved this is being shared openly, and I appreciate you informing us. Besides LeoVegas, this issue highlights the broader trend of reduced RTPs, which is becoming increasingly common, making players feel deceived.
In the long run, LeoVegas stands to lose since Bigwinboard boasts a large community, and they miss out on future player referrals. I respect your choice not to fold under pressure but instead stand firm, refusing to compromise your integrity or that of the community you’ve built.
Here’s hoping that your future endeavors yield better partnership deals, whether through CPA or revenue sharing.
I stopped using LeoVegas because my preferred games only offered a 94% RTP, yielding less favorable gaming sessions there.
Given the numerous alternatives available, I've decided to cease my engagement with LeoVegas. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
LeoVegas recently acted poorly by enforcing stringent document requirements on certain players only to close their accounts after submission. Mid-last year, they were acquired by a company, presumably American, which reopened accounts citing a transfer oversight of KYC lists. They offered welcome bonuses exclusive to Sweden, enticing people to play. However, two months later, they rechecked and closed accounts again, showing a disregard for fairness and merely targeting profitable players.
In a repeat of a recent incident, LeoVegas escalated document demands for particular players, later shutting accounts under the guise of acquisition changes. They reopened accounts citing a missed KYC list transfer, offering bonuses exclusively in Sweden, coaxing deposits and gameplay. After a short span, accounts were reviewed and closed again, showcasing their careless strategy.
John, from LeoVegas, behaves arrogantly, seeming to delight in complicating matters for players. He's got an inflated sense of righteousness, often undermining others with his pretentiousness.
I’m astounded by what I’ve read, and it's quite disappointing. I’ve encountered confusing KYC procedures during my decade-plus gambling experience, often used by casinos hoping players back out to reverse withdrawals.
Perhaps the CG team, which partners with LeoVegas and holds a significant share, as I recall, could address these concerns.
It’s unfortunate how smaller affiliates are disregarded, even if the numbers should hold more significance to them.
It’s disheartening to witness attempts to defraud partners by delinking referred parties. It’s disappointing, and if there’s no rectification or apology, I’ll also cease playing there.
Though I haven’t gambled at LeoVegas, this feedback makes me consider trying different options.
LeoVegas's recent conduct isn’t entirely shocking but still disheartening. They transitioned from an excellent casino to a mediocre one. They withdrew from the Norwegian market, which I’m part of, albeit after negatively changing their approach, including poor service and cancelled accounts.
Thanks for caring about the community
I observed the LeoVegas situation on LinkedIn, and it didn't surprise me. Other users' reviews and feedback already showcased these issues. Complaints have highlighted their lack of professionalism.
Once, LeoVegas was highly regarded, but their decline is unfortunate.
Bonuses can often be played quickly, withdrawing real cash in Sweden, LeoVegas hasn't directly wronged customers, but I’m hearing a lot of negative buzz lately.
@dreswede spin-samurai-app.com serves as an impartial igaming news and comparison resource, where we work hard to ensure that all bonus information is accurate. However, users are still responsible for verifying the terms independently and confirming the licensing and trustworthiness of casinos shown on our site.